Your morning AI reading.

Create a recurring task for me called “Morning AI radar”.

Schedule: every day at 08:00 in the Europe/Warsaw time zone, accounting for daylight saving time. Start the review at that time. Show me the result in this app when the work is finished.

Save the following instructions as the task to perform on each run. If I already have a task with this name, show it to me and propose updating it instead of creating a duplicate. Confirm the time, time zone, next run and whether the task needs my computer to be on. If I need to approve something in the interface, tell me the exact step. Do not claim the task is active until you have confirmed it was saved. If you cannot schedule tasks or search the web, say what is missing.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR EACH RUN

Prepare a short, practical radar in English covering the most important AI changes from the past 24 hours, measured from the start of this run. Use current web search.

I am interested in the perspective of an entrepreneur, product manager, CTO, developer and someone implementing AI. I want to read a morning briefing and return to work instead of following the news all day.

GOAL
Do not list every news item. Select only information that:
- provides a new technical capability,
- could change how products are built,
- affects developer or agent workflows,
- changes the cost or availability of technology,
- opens up new business applications,
- or signals a significant direction in the AI market.
A high-profile story without practical consequences can be omitted.

CLASSIFICATION
Label each item with one tag and its matching icon:
🔥 [TRY] — technology or a feature available now and worth testing in practice.
⚙️ [WORKFLOW] — changes how software is built or how people work with AI.
💡 [OPPORTUNITY] — opens up a new product or business application.
👀 [WATCH] — an important direction that does not yet require action.
💰 [COST] — a change in pricing, limits, licensing or the economics of using AI.
🌍 [MARKET] — a significant business, regulatory or infrastructure change.

AREAS
Monitor models and research, agents and automation, agentic engineering, AI coding, voice AI and realtime, vision and computer use, image and video, APIs, MCP and developer tools, hardware, robotics, AR/VR and spatial computing, open source and open weights, and significant business changes.

COMPANIES AND LABS
Always check for significant announcements from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind/Gemini and xAI.
Check just as thoroughly: DeepSeek, Alibaba/Qwen/Wan, Moonshot/Kimi, Z.ai/Zhipu/GLM, MiniMax, ByteDance/Seed/Seedance, Tencent/Hunyuan, Baidu/ERNIE, Kuaishou/Kling.
Also check Meta, Microsoft/GitHub, NVIDIA, Apple, Mistral, Hugging Face and other significant providers.
Do not force a mention of a company if it has not announced anything significant.

SOURCES
Prefer primary sources: official blogs, documentation, changelogs, GitHub, Hugging Face and research papers.
Also use newsletter.genai.works, futuretools.io, forwardfuture.com and chinai.substack.com to discover topics.
Check significant new content from SmartTechSynergy, Matt Wolfe, AI Explained, Matthew Berman, Mateusz Chrobok and overment.
Treat newsletters and YouTube as sources of topics. Verify significant launches with the provider. Include a direct link to a source that supports the description of each item.

VERIFICATION
Use the event date, not the article date. Do not present an older launch as today's news.
Clearly distinguish: available now, preview, announcement, waitlist and limited rollout.
Describe a provider's benchmark as a provider's benchmark. Do not call a model “the best” without sufficient independent evidence.
Where it matters in practice, state availability in Poland or the EU.
If you cannot verify a date or source, omit the item or label it unconfirmed. Do not fill gaps with invented facts. If web search is unavailable, report the limitation instead of presenting remembered knowledge as news from the past 24 hours.

FORMAT
# AI — daily radar | DD.MM.YYYY
Use the date in the Europe/Warsaw time zone.

## Top stories
3–5 items, or fewer on a quiet day.
Format each item as:
**[ICON] [TAG] Short name of the change.** What changed. **In practice:** what it enables or why it deserves attention. [Source](direct link)

## Other developments
At most 3–5 items:
- **[TAG] Topic.** One short sentence explaining its practical significance. [Source](direct link)

## Unconfirmed
Optional, at most 2 items:
- **[RUMOUR] Topic.** What is known and what has not been confirmed. [Source](direct link)

EDITORIAL RULES
Prefer 5–8 good items in total to 10 mediocre ones. The limit covers all sections. Show fewer on a quiet day. If there are no significant confirmed changes, say so briefly. Omit empty sections.
Do not artificially represent every company or category.
Each item must answer at least one question: what can I do with this, what changes in the way I work, is it worth testing, does the cost change, or is there a new business opportunity?
Keep the entire briefing to approximately 350 words at most. No clickbait, marketing tone or unnecessary descriptions.
Return a finished briefing for me to read in this app.